GalacticSlacker HQ - GalacticSlacker HQ

On intelligent design, controversy and zeros

[Print]
Oh, I must have been mistaken. There is no controversy concerning the validity of Darwinian evolution. I, and many educated, thinking people like me, simply don't exist.
http://www.idthefuture.com/index.php?title=b....=1&pb=1

Sorry to have wasted your bandwidth while not actually being here.

have a nice day.

first art show

[Print]
Well, I finally gathered up enough courage to put some photos in a small art show. I entered four photos, two portraits and two landscapes. Here they are, and how they placed.

Landscapes:
tangled webs

restraint

Portraits:
fifteen

flight

It was fun. I learned a lot. There were only about 13 portraits, but there were 29 landscapes. I know that one entrant entered at least 7 photos.

The many problems of Darwinian biology, part 1

[Print]
Rocky Mountain News, August 6, 2005

The control that evolution supporters hold over the debate "is a kind of an intellectual apartheid," said Doug Groothuis, professor of philosophy at Denver Seminary and author of 10 books that explore the relationship between science and technology and belief.

"It's like they're saying, 'You can have your religious ideas in church, at home and in the family, but don't you dare argue on the basis of science,' " Groothuis said. "But intelligent design arguments don't quote the Bible. They appeal to the phenomena in nature, like the complex functioning of the cell.

"If you can't explain the complexity (of an organism) on the basis of natural law or chance, and it shows evidence of design, you can infer a designer."

nod: William Dembski

Folding in vim -- it's a beautiful thing

[Print]
The one thing about vim that most frustrates me is that there is so much power packed in to such a small space over so many years. Even when I use advanced features, it nags at me that there are so many more great and useful features that I either haven't mastered, can't remember, or don't even know about.

Folding is one of those features.

Fortunately, Michael J. McGuffin has made the world a better place to live by compiling his notes on vim folding.

As I jokingly tell my friends, "The vim will make you strong!"

out of the mouths of babes, cutting to the core

[Print]
Here's a lightly edited posting from Theology Mom, Even a Six Year Can Understand It:

MOM: Some Christians don't like it that Hugh [Ross] teaches children that dinosaurs lived before people, millions of years ago.

CHILD: Why not? Everyone knows dinosaurs lived before people.

MOM: Well, some Christians think there were dinosaurs on Noah's ark.

CHILD: What?! That's silly! Every book in the library says that dinosaurs were extinct before humans.

MOM: Does the Bible say anything about dinosaurs?

CHILD: No. But the Bible can't tell us about EVERYTHING.

MOM: It can't? But how can I know if dinosaurs really existed if the Bible doesn't mention them? What about hominids? Some Christians don't think hominids existed because the Bible doesn't talk about them.

CHILD: But the Bible doesn't say anything about God making Jupiter, but we still know about it.

MOM: So, you mean that we can know things that aren't mentioned in the Bible?

CHILD: Yeah!

It's really that simple.

I'm really starting to have immense sympathy with people who are atheist because they can't believe in the God of Young Earth wackology. I don't believe in that god, either.

Some solid science for Playboy subscribers

[Print]
If you're a subscriber or reader of Playboy magazine, a future issue may include an interview with Dr. Hugh Ross of Reasons to Believe. I got the scoop at Krista's site. This is very cool, and very, very bold for a Christian minister. I hope Playboy actually publishes the article -- it would be very bold for Playboy to publish such an interview, also.

Talking about evolution

[Print]
Thank you, Krista!

In her posting, Talking Evolution:

great side note:

You may be wondering, If Darwinism is a fatally flawed model, then why don't scientists abandon it? Well, it's because there is no better alternative. It's the best contender out there. What's the alternative? Young-earth creationism? Uh... no. What about Intelligent Design? One small problem there -- it's not a scientific model. ID is a philosophical enterprise, not a full-fledged scientific model.

maybe the best advice, for Christians, is at the very bottom:

One more thought: even though I don't believe in evolution, I think it is a tragic mistake for Christians to make fun of people who DO believe in evolution. This is a huge turn-off for people from the Gospel. Disagreeing with people's beliefs based on evidence and data is one thing, but making fun of people's beliefs is not a Christian virtue.

Hmm.... maybe I should quit mocking them with the label of "The Church of Spontaneous Generation?"

What Zooko's been working on

[Print]
Well, I finally find out what my cousin's been working on, since it's all over the net, now:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=25012
http://lwn.net/Articles/145456/

Of course, this actually may not be what Zooko has been working on -- it could be something else that Phil Zimmerman is involved in... I guess.

Thoughts on trends in digital photography

[Print]
To date, the trend has been (and we're working on a VERY SHORT baseline and a RAPIDLY SHIFTING market, so this exercise may be pointless):

Canon Rebel/300/350XT : 18 month cycle
Canon D60/10D/20D: 18 month cycle (20Da is not considered in this trend line)
Canon 1D/1DmkII: 3 year cycle
Canon 1Ds/1DsmkII: 5 year cycle

It takes a long time to develop, prototype, test, refine and produce a new camera. The more advanced the camera, and the more demanding the target customer, the longer the development cycle.

I've read in the DPReview forums that the production price of the full-frame sensor is 3x the cost of the smaller sensors. It's important to remember that Canon's original trend was to resist producing the "digital lenses." That indicates /to me/ that Canon was working on lowering the cost of full-frame sensors, but relented in the face of third party lens manufacturers producing "digital lenses" for EOS mounts.

With advances in technology, prices inevitably fall as technological boundaries come crashing down. I expect the price of full frame sensors to cascade downward at some point, leaving the APS-C-only and four-third manufacturers clutching and defending what Canon can argue (marketing!) are inferior sensors and inferior lens, but with lens mounts which can never be expanded to FF sensor technology.

IF (and that's all all caps, bold, italicized 'IF') full-frame sensors do become a standard part of consumer dSLRs, my guess is that Canon will be first, and Nikon will follow 24 months later. At that point, the Konica-Minolta-Sony partnership will have to make a choice about whether they want to ever attempt to compete in the Pro market again (think Minolta Maxim9), or if they want to play in the rapidly shrinking margins of the consumer dSLR market forever. Olympus is married to their four-thirds mount, and there's no way for them to escape it.

Canon and Nikon stand to extend their market dominance in SLR, pro and prosumer photography for another 10 to 20 years if they can corner the competition into the smaller-format sensors, then run into the full-frame market. As a lifetime conscientious risk taker, I'd say it's a risk they can't afford not to take.

How the "green" biofules and "renewable energy sources" relate the price at the pump

[Print]
So, it turns out that biofules and "renewable energy sources" are killing us!

[ Source: Yahoo! News ]

But researchers at Cornell University and the University of California-Berkeley say it takes 29 percent more fossil energy to turn corn into ethanol than the amount of fuel the process produces. For switch grass, a warm weather perennial grass found in the Great Plains and eastern North America United States, it takes 45 percent more energy and for wood, 57 percent.

It takes 27 percent more energy to turn soybeans into biodiesel fuel and more than double the energy produced is needed to do the same to sunflower plants, the study found.

Let me translate that: When you buy fuel that has ethanol added to it to make it "more environmentally friendly," you're effectively burning 29% more fossil fuels for the percentage of ethanol in your tank.

Oh, and don't forget the "$3 billion in state and federal government subsidies that go toward ethanol production in the United States each year, payments that mask the true costs...."

So, not only are you increasing pollution by using ethanol gasoline, you're stealing money from tax payers at the same time! Ain't that great? It's like a Lftofasciest dream come true!

Oh, yeah.... Dont' worry, since most refineries are far away from where you (i.e. most people) live, it really doesn't matter, that pollution is being spewed into someone else's back yard.

The net effect is pollution concentration, where pollution from mobile sources is reduced, and point emissions (emissions from refineries and power plants) is increased. Oddly enough, the environment can deal with mobile source emissions orders of magnitude more effectively than it can with large, point emissions. The same thing happens with with electric cars, where the total emissions for each car are actually higher than the emissions from a typical gasoline car, but the the emissions are from the electric plant, not the car, directly.

Now go, fill your tank with "green" ethanol-enhanced gasoline, or charge your electric "environmentally friendly" car, and have a smug, green day.

The business of imaging

[Print]
If you're interested in digital imaging and business, you might want to take a look at this Bloomberg article, which deals almost exclusively with Canon and Nikon digital SLRs, but shines a lot of light into the business of it all.

For Canon's single-lens reflex unit alone, operating profit margin may climb to 35.4 percent this year, from 31.7 percent a year earlier, according to Moriyama. The margin for compact models is expected to drop to 10.1 percent from 17.6 percent, he said.

Nikon's operating profit margin for single-lens reflex cameras will rise to 26.1 percent in the year ending March 31 from 21.9 percent a year ago, Moriyama said. That compares with an expected loss margin of its digital compact models of 5.3 percent this year and 6.6 percent last year, he said.

35.4%! My first thought was, "dang!" But a little thought showed my hypocrisy. It's today's profits that finance tomorrows advancements/new products. Yeah, I would willingly toss down $8,000 for a Canon EOS 1Ds mark II, if I had it, knowing that $2832.00 of that was "pure profit." In another 5-10 years it would be nice to know I helped finance an upgrade path for myself.

[quote] Thom on Rules

[Print]

First, learn the rules.

Second, break the rules.

Third, tell others to always follow the rules.

yeah... it's like that.

[ source ]

One world, Three suns, "rare earth"

[Print]

There are some hundred billion (1011) galaxies, each with, on the average, a hundred billion stars. In all the galaxies, there are perhaps as many planets as stars, 1011 x 1011 = 1022, ten billion trillion. In the face of such overpowering numbers, what is the likelihood that only one ordinary star, the Sun, is accompanied by an inhabited planet? Why should we, tucked away in some forgotten corner of the Cosmos, be so fortunate? To me, it seems far more likely that the universe is brimming over with life. But we humans do not yet know. We are just beginning our explorations. The only planet we are sure is inhabited is a tiny speck of rock and metal, shining feebly by reflected sunlight, and at this distance utterly lost.

-- Carl Sagan

Call Carl an "optimist."

Since the late 1990's, several techniques for detecting the presence of planets orbiting far off stars have been developed and tested. Surprisingly, to the skeptics, they work! Unfortunately, for the Carl Sagans out there, we're not finding anything approaching one planet per ordinary star. To date, the number stands at 147 planets (or 155, depending on your source) after scouring many thousands of candidate stars. If the stars surveyed, far fewer than 1% have planets, and all of the planets appear to be gas giants* orbiting far too close to the star to allow a life support planet to exist in a life support orbit. (* It looks like we've found one or two "rock giants," which are far too large for life, but far too close tot their stars to have survived as gas giants.)

Okay, enough background....

Today there's news of another giant discovered, but this one in a tri-star solar system. That pretty cool. The cool is the good news. The bad news (for astronomers) is that this pretty much chucks their whole model for planetary formation. (Talk about gong back to the drawing board!)

A few quotes about what we're learning that should be enlightening to anyone who hasn't already drawn a conclusion that will follow:

A planet occupying an orbit among three stars is seen as more evidence that the solar system may not be typical.

More than 60 percent of stars in the Milky Way galaxy come in pairs or occasionally threesomes.

The strange planet of the three suns, the astronomers said, is a reminder that not all protoplanetary disks are like the one around the early Sun.

Conclusion:
The "Rare Earth hypothesis," states that the earth is unique in the universe, and the only planet capable of sustaining advanced life. The more we learn about the Earth and our solar system, the more we realize that a major reason the earth is capable of sustaining life if because of the solar system it exists in -- a large gas giant far outside the orbit of the earth (Jupiter), which acts as a meteor/asteroid/comet shield (Earth has three!), a just-right-for-life star (the Sun), and lots of other factors that involve the asteroid belt, some belts on the other side of Pluto's orbit, the age of the Sun, the orbit of the earth, and lots of other cool stuff. The more we learn about extra-solar planets (planets not in our solar system), the more we realize that a stable, multi-planet system, with the gas giants on the outside is exceedingly rare in itself.

Sorry, Carl. Every day it looks like it's just us, and all that that implies.

(Footnote: I'm not going to stop reading Science Fiction about civilizations far, far away.)

link: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/15/science/15....et.html

Redefining Spyware: From CRYPTO-GRAM 15.Jul.2005

[Print]

Redefining Spyware

The problem with spyware is that it can be in the eye of the beholder. There are companies that decry the general problem, but have their own software report back to a central server.

This kind of thing can result in a conflict of interest: "Spyware is spyware only if I don't have a corporate interest in it." Here's the most recent example: "Microsoft's Windows AntiSpyware application is no longer flagging adware products from Claria Corp. as a threat to PC users. Less than a week after published reports of acquisition talks between Microsoft Corp. and the Redwood City, Calif.-based distributor of the controversial Gator ad-serving software, security researchers have discovered that Microsoft has quietly downgraded its Claria detections. "

If you're a user of AntiSpyware, you can fix this. Claria's spyware is now flagged as "Ignore" by default, but you can still change the action to "Quarantine" or "Remove." I recommend "Remove."

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1834607,00.asp

Kinda begs the question, "Who's watching the watchers?"

I guess it's all about who you trust.

quote

[Print]

Before you install your Unix operating system and turn on your machine, you need to have a security plan in place, starting with a security checklist.

amusingly enough, found on page 970 of O'Reilly's Unix Power Tools

More RSS

[Print]

I just put a copy of the RE RSS spewer on the Seekers of the Red Mist site. Who knows if anyone on that site uses RSS, but the only way to tell is to put it out there.

I've got some details in my RSS spewer to get cleaned up.

I'll have to look around and see if any other sites would benefit from RSS feeds. Since most of the sites are restricted access, they won't be candidates.

RSS

[Print]

I've been hearing a lot of noise about RSS and feeds for a long time, but it was just noise. Finally, I'm starting to see practical applications appearing for RSS, and people starting to use it in ways that actually make sense.

This discovery lead to the realization of what information to send to an RSS feed from a RealizationEngine: if it's world-readable, then it's safe to feed. If it's restricted, it's not safe.

At one time, I had hoped to find a sensible way to create user-based feeds, but that's not going to be possible with the RSS agrigators that I have access to at this time. I'm guessing that what I'm using is more or less representative of what's in the wild.

blogging without blogging?

[Print]
I ran into this "blog" this morning while tracking around the net. It's the kimdaba mailing list reformatted as a blog.

Makes me consider the ethical implications of republishing a mailing list in such a manner. Do I give up all my rights to my writing when I submit them to a public mailing list?

hmm....

self-portrait

[Print]

finally! a self-portrait that I actually like.

I just happened to stumble across this one today.

Little Hunter

[Print]

I can't believe how long it's been since I posted. I took this shot back in June and my parent's house. I wasn't really happy with it until I turned up the contrast and saturation a little. It's over-sharpened, in my opinion, to make the little hunter show up a little better. It's okay. Mostly it was really cool to watch such a tiny hunter try to prey on critters 3-10x it's own size.

There's got to be a better way...

[Print]
Call me cynical, but do not tell me Windows is easier to use than Linux. Tom is your average computer user. Jesse is an advanced computer user. I'm just a guy with a computer, but I don't have to know all of the stuff below, nor jump through these hoops, nor waste my electricity on CPU cycles to power 15 different programs to protect me from my operating system....

> >From: Tom Florer <xxxxx@yahoo.com>
> >To: Chris <xxxxxxx@yahoo.com>, Jesse
> <xxxxxx@hotmail.com>, Jody <havoc@harrisdev.com>
> >Subject: Uh-oh,...got a problem...
> >Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 19:38:41 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >I'm seeking a little virus advice...with my new
> >high-speed internet connection I've been surfing
> all
> >over the place, trying to catch up on years of not
> >experiencing all the internet has to offer. And
> now
> >(probably as a direct consequence of this) my
> Norton
> >Antivirus Software tells me I've picked up a virus.
> >Dammit.
> >
> >It tells me it's a Trojan Horse virus (actually, it
> >tells me this every two minutes), but it can't fix
> it
> >because access to the file is denied. Now it's my
> >understanding that a trojan horse just kinda sits
> >there and does nothing until some trigger sets it
> off,
> >then it does something (which I'll find out at that
> >time what it will be).
> >
> >Have you ever heard of an antivirus program called
> >EZArmor? It comes with my high-speed service, but
> I
> >didn't install it because it told me I had to
> >completely remove Norton from my PC.
> >
> >Any recommendations on what I should do? Should I
> try
> >the EZArmor in the hopes that it will work? Any
> other
> >suggestions on how to get rid of this stupid thing?
> >Any help would be greatly apprecimacated.
> >
> >-Tom
> >
> >Today's email has been brought to you
> >by the letters E, M, and the number 9.
> >

--- Jesse <xxxxxx@hotmail.com> wrote:

> First thing I would do is go here:
>
> http://www.symantec.com/search/
>
> and search for info on the exact filename/virus that
> you have. See if it
> gives you information.
>
> If I found nothing good there, I might go to
> Mcafee's website to see what
> they say:
>
> http://us.mcafee.com/virusInfo/default.asp
>
> Has Norton quarantined it? If so, you may be ok.
>
> Also, I don't know anything about EZ Armor. For
> many years there were just
> 2 major players: Norton and Mcafee. It appears
> that EZ Armor is made by
> Computer Associates who is a big IT
> solutions/consulting company so it might
> be a good product. I would make sure u can get
> Norton Anti Virus back
> (without paying more) or at least that EZ Armor is a
> full licensed product
> (ie not trial) before trying that.
>
> On a side note, I like taking chances and many times
> if nothing works I
> would just delete the file. That isn't the
> recommended course of action.
> Lol.
>
> On another side note, if you get rid of all your
> virii issues, make sure and
> clean out your spyware. Use Spybot Search and
> Destroy, along with Adaware.
> This is a must have because everyone has at least
> some spyware (and probably
> tons). You can get both at download.com (both are
> free). They are top d/ls
> as you can find here:
>
> http://www.download.com/3101-2001_4-0-1.html?tag=dir
>
> Also, spyware doctor is up there near the top too.
> Can't remember how good
> that was but that is another one to check out. I
> recommend using at least 2
> to ensure u get all of the spyware off.
>
> - Jesse
>
>

Many thanks to Chris and Jesse for the good advice...I
finally managed to get it quarantined by running
Norton in Safe Mode. McAffee didn't even recognize it
as a virus. Stupid jerks.

As for spyware, I do run SpyBot on a regular basis.
AdAware is on my machine, but every time I run it my
machine locks up. They're stupid jerks too.

I guess I'll just have to stop going to virus.com!

-Tom

Today's email has been brought to you
by the letters E, M, and the number 9.

Adoramapix.com and the Linux Photographer

[Print]
Well, well, well.... Look what Adorama has done for the Linux Photographer. Not only does the site allow easy bulk uploading for any computer, including Linux machines, but they give you three choices of tools to use!

- Use the web interface for small batches, and by extension, take the script I wrote for ClubPhoto.com and modify it to work with http://www.adoramapix.com/
- Use the javascrip applet for easy graphical batches
OR
- Use FTP.

sweetness!

I haven't ordered prints from Adoramapix.com, yet, but that'll be my next order.

I'll post with quality results.

how are your rope skills?

[Print]
I ordered a cool book of knots for the boys for this summer. (yes, for the boys!) Of course, the only way for them to learn is for me to learn, and esplain to them, right? (right.)

So the book includes "24 Most Useful Hitches, Ties, Wraps, and Knots."

I've narrowed the most important knots you need to know how to tie to a grand total of 3.

- half hitch
- clove hitch
- sheet bend

Most of the rest of the good stuff is a variation on those three.

half hitch:
a half hitch by itself isn't worth much, but two in series is a jewel.
Variations:
- timberline hitch
- ring knot
- Prusik knot (a variation of the ring knot)
- sheep shank
- double-half hitch (which, interestingly enough, is a loop with the rope clove hitched back on itself)

Clove hitch:
I love this hitch. Many of the variations of this hitch are when you tie the rope to itself or another piece of rope, but it's still mechanically the same knot.
- rolling hitch
- tautline hitch (which is actually the same as the rolling hitch, just the rope tied back on itself)
- Constrictor Knot (very cool)

Sheet bend:
All my life, I've been told that the square knot was the knot to use to join two piece of rope. All my life, they've sucked, and I thought it was just me. Turns out, the sheet bend is the knot I was looking for.

When I first started tying the sheet bend, it was strange and uncomfortable, but there was something familiar about it. After several weeks of messing with it, I finally realized why it was so familiar -- I've been tying them for ~25 years! it's the sheet bend that makes the bowline what it is. (duh!)
Variations:
- bowline
- double sheet bend

With the "short end sheet bend," which is just a method for tying a sheet bend, I found the easiest, fastest way to tie a sheet bend or throw a bowline. slick.

Other very handy knots:
- Harness loop (a mid-rope loop that doesn't slip or close – foot loops, hand loops, anchor points, etc.)
- overhand knot, which is basically what a "half hitch" is - fisherman's knot, etc.
- figure 8 stopper

I'll probably never buy another cargo strap or bungie strap, now... I guess that would be bad for the economy, if it wasn't for the fact that I'll spend that money on something else!

Well, maybe bungie straps. Bungie straps are still cool.

[chronomark] *Multiple

[Print]
16.Jun.2005: Matchbox, another super-light X desktop. I'm impressed. It's not for power users, but really under-powered computers, and young children, it's great!

17.Jun.2005: got a new motor installed in the driver's-side door of my 1992 Ford F150 so that the window will go down, and back up under it's own power. Cool. Literally. It was a great Father's Day present from Sweetwife and the Things.

18.Jun.2005: Finally bit the nail and updated my desktop to KDE 3.4. I've been using 3.4 on other, test systems, and there were some features that I decided were worth breaking the primary desktop for a few hours to get. Using apt4rpm, it went perfectly smoothly. I was really surprised. Every other KDE upgrade I've done has cost me not less than a couple of hours. Very Nice!

19.Jun.2005: After getting the Zaurus up and running with Watapon, I've been pleased as punch with the Z. Unfortunately, the backspace key wasn't working in vim, and I really, really like vim. If you do a search on 'backspace' here, you'll find another post with a link to a page on fixing various keys in various Unix apps. a set command and a fixdel added to .vimrc, and all is well! You'll actually find the fix in vim's help fixdel. I used it last time when the term on my Rackspace server started misbehaving. Looks like I need to update the link, anyway: http://www.ibb.net/~anne/keyboard.html

oh, yeah, this one, too

[Print]

I also got a comitment on an order of this one -- this is the actual poster, resized for the web. Once she knows the size she wants, she'll officially place the order.

actually sold a print/poster

[Print]

I actually got an order for a 20x18 poster of this image. It was to the organizer of the event, so I can hardly let it go to my head. He's biased. He actually has one of my photos from about 4 years ago in his office, about a 12x18, I guess.

stuff in the sky

[Print]

Some people really like the sunrays-through-cloud shots, and they do make nice backdrops from some things, so I shoot them occassionally, even though there are probably already too many of these shots in the world.

Then there is the beauty and terror of a summer thunderhead. This one dropped small hail on us, nothing down the road, and no telling what else other places.

No sunset here

[Print]
Saturday, we finally got moving, and headed south to Carlsbad. We stopped and picnicked on the road up to the caverns, then carried on.

Taking a huge risk, we descended into the Natural Entrance of Carlsbad Caverns afoot with Thing2's promises that he wouldn't touch, wouldn't run, would stay close, wouldn't whine, wouldn't ask us to carry him, and would try to speak softly.... and down we went. (If you have to ask why that's a huge risk, you've never spent any time with Thing2!)

It went surprisingly well, too!

It was very nice that Sweetwife and the boys didn't try to race to the Big Room, and most of the people passing us were kind enough to let me get my shot before racing past. I was surprised at the number of cameras in the hole, and the number of flashes fired during the tour.

A sucker for a sunset

[Print]
Thing2 and I went to camp this weekend. Thing1 stayed with Nonna, Poppa and AuntK. We met in Lovington for dinner, then headed home. When we dropped off the Caprock, Sweetwife said, "Look at that!" I slammed on the breaks and turned on the emergency flashers, since we were kind of in a blind turn for traffic following us, grabbed the camera and tripod and shot these.

That peak is El Capitan from about 110 miles, and that ridge in the last shot is part of the Caprock, as it appears in a Louis L'Amour novel.

One epic battle...

[Print]

What a great weekend.

306 teams
1836 players
22 fields
2 days
$15,000 prize money

ONE epic battle for supremacy!

That's the 2005 Roswell GridIron 4-on-4 flag football tournament, and the largest 4-on-4 flag football tournament in the United States is a wrap. $5000 to United Way of Chaves County. $2400 raised for Boys and Girls Club of Roswell.

630 photos for me.

After almost a WEEK of rotating, color correcting and cropping, I finished them up today.

Oh, my eyes!

v 2.5.0c

	Canon 10D and Linux GPG key Just fun (1 folders) Linux and RAW Digital Photography Linux tips (2/0/0) (4 folders) odd but possibly useful	peanut gallery (53/0/0) Perl (1 folders)