<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="RE2rss/0.0.0" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
		xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
		xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
		xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>
    <channel>
      <title>GalacticSlacker HQ</title>
      <managingEditor>havoc@harrisdev.com</managingEditor>
      <description>RSS feed from GalacticSlacker HQ</description>
      <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re</link>
      <language>en</language>
      <generator>RE-RSS spewer</generator>
      <item>
        <title>Bad faith -- poor reasons to be a Christian</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1166#1166</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1166#1166</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1166]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Not that being a Christian is wrong, but there are bad ways to reason to the truth of Christianity.... It's a very difficult concept to explain in a Fundamentalist culture that most Christians I am around.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Not that being a Christian is wrong, but there are bad ways to reason
    to the truth of Christianity.... It's a very difficult concept to
    explain in a Fundamentalist culture that most Christians I am
    around.<br /><br />You can believe in right things for the wrong
    reasons. You <i>can</i> believe that gravity works by magic. You
    <i>can</i> believe that the sun rises in the east because it's pulled
    by fairies. Your reasoning would be wrong, but gravity will keep
    working, and the sun will keep rising in the east. The fact that your
    right belief is wrongly founded does not mean that gravity won't work
    and the sun won't rise, but it does mean that your belief is not
    useful.<br /><br /><ul><li>Because gravity is the result of magic, you
    can't make predictions about gravity in other areas. Magic is
    impossible to build predictive models on. Just as an example, you can't
    put satellites in orbit around the earth, so all of our wonderful
    modern communication tools are out the window.</li><br /><br
    /><li>Because fairies raise the sun, you really don't know what time
    the sun will rise and set. Your use of calendars is really just hopeful
    speculation, and the seasons are the result of the capricious whims of
    the sun fairies.</li></ul><br /><br />So what's the point of all this?
    Well, there are wrong reason to be a Christian. That is not to say that
    Christianity is not true! Christianity <b>is</b> true, but not for the
    reasons you (speaking hypothetically) might think it is. Your
    (hypothetical) false reasoning results in a faith that is (often) so
    severely crippled that it is irrelevant to the world you live in -- and
    our faith should be world changing!<br /><br />Michael Patten talks
    about it in today's podcast, <a
    href="http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/07/03/top-ten-reasons-
    not-to-be-a-christian-part-1/">Top Ten Reasons Not to be a Christian -
    Part 1</a> from Theology Unplugged.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 11:04:02 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>WALL-E</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1165#1165</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1165#1165</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1165]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Someone asked me about it yesterday, and my comment was "It's not as good as Toy Story, but that still means it can be great!" I really liked it. The characters were, as usual for Pixar, endearing.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Someone asked me about it yesterday, and my comment was "It's not as
    good as <i>Toy Story</i>, but that still means it can be great!" I
    really liked it. The characters were, as usual for Pixar, endearing.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:14:44 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>The Incredible Hulk</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1164#1164</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1164#1164</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1164]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Yeah! Roar! Nice reboot after the 2005 disaster.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Yeah! Roar! Nice reboot after the 2005 disaster.<br /><br />(It was
    better than the previews, and had a killer-teaser-for-the-sequel
    ending!)
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:13:36 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Kung Fu Panda</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1163#1163</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1163#1163</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1163]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Hiaya!
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Hiaya!<br /><br />Looks like Dreamworks finally figured out Walt
    Disney's secret to success -- there is no secret! Just be yourself!
    Don't try to politicize the kids and their families. Don't try to tell
    us that our values are old fashioned and irrelevant. Don't waste screen
    time with stupid fart jokes. Just tell me a great story.<br /><br
    />Skadoosh!
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:12:45 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Summer of movies!</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1162#1162</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1162#1162</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1162]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Wow and I behind on my micro movie reviews.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Wow and I behind on my micro movie reviews.<br /><br />Opening June 6,
    2008 - Kung Fu Panda<br />Opening June 13, 2008 - The Incredible Hulk
    (maybe)<br />Opening June 27, 2008 - WALL-E (definitely!)<br /><br />I
    begin...
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:12:07 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Bush's America: 100 Percent Al-Qaida Free Since 2001, by Ann Coulter (06/12/2008)</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1161#1161</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1161#1161</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1161]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      I like Ann Coulter. I like to occasionally read her stuff. She's always right, but I fear that reading her books or regularly reading her columns would cause me to start thinking that many people agree with me.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    I like Ann Coulter. I like to occasionally read her stuff. She's always
    right, but I fear that reading her books or regularly reading her
    columns would cause me to start thinking that many people agree with
    me.<br /><br />Anyway, this column is great as usual:
    http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=26979<br /><br />A few
    excerpts:<br /><blockquote>It is unquestionable that Bush has made this
    country safe by keeping Islamic lunatics pinned down fighting our
    troops in Iraq. In the past few years, our brave troops have killed
    more than 20,000 al-Qaida and other Islamic militants in Iraq alone.
    That's 20,000 terrorists who will never board a plane headed for JFK --
    or a landmark building, for that matter.<br /><br />We are, in fact,
    fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them at, say, the
    corner of 72nd and Columbus in Manhattan -- the mere mention of which
    never fails to enrage liberals, which is why you should say it as often
    as possible.<br /><br />The Iraq war has been a stunning success. The
    Iraqi army is "standing up" (as they say), fat Muqtada al-Sadr --the
    Dr. Phil of Islamofascist radicalism -- has waddled off in retreat to
    Iran, and Sadr City and Basra are no longer war zones. Our servicemen
    must be baffled by the constant nay-saying coming from their own
    country. <br /><br />...<br /><br />Al-Qaida is virtually destroyed,
    surprising even the CIA. Two weeks ago, The Washington Post reported:
    "Less than a year after his agency warned of new threats from a
    resurgent al-Qaida, CIA Director Michael V. Hayden now portrays the
    terrorist movement as essentially defeated in Iraq and Saudi Arabia and
    on the defensive throughout much of the rest of the world, including in
    its presumed haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border."<br /><br
    />...<br /><br />But no one notices when 9/11 doesn't happen. Indeed,
    if we had somehow stopped the 9/11 attack, we'd all be watching
    Mohammed Atta being interviewed on MSNBC, explaining his lawsuit
    against the Bush administration. Maureen Dowd would be writing columns
    describing Khalid Sheik Mohammed as a "wannabe" terrorist being treated
    like Genghis Khan by an excitable Bush administration.<br /><br />We
    begin to forget what it was like to turn on the TV, see a tornado, a
    car chase or another Pamela Anderson marriage and think: Good --
    another day without a terrorist attack. </blockquote>
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:35:47 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Probability is sufficient</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1160#1160</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1160#1160</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1160]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      The Sufficiency of Probability, by C Michael Patton
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    <a
    href="http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/06/13/the-sufficiency-
    of-probability/">The Sufficiency of Probability</a>, by C Michael
    Patton<br /><blockquote>In other words, our belief in Christ’s
    resurrection should not be sidetracked simply because someone presents
    an alternative possibility. Yes, we engage these alternatives, but we
    don’t give them more credit than they deserve. Those who say that the
    Christian story borrowed from other religions or that Christ’s body was
    thrown into a shallow grave have simply presented other possibilities
    that are often no more sufficient to warrant credibility than my “look,
    the door is unlocked.” Possibility, yes. Probability, no.</blockquote>
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:02:47 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Church Possibly Dates to Earliest Years of Christianity</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1159#1159</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1159#1159</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1159]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      If tests confirm that it dates back to between 33 AD to 70 AD, as the archaeologists claim, it would make it the earliest known place of Christian worship by around two hundred years.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    <blockquote><p>If tests confirm that it dates back to between 33 AD to
    70 AD, as the archaeologists claim, it would make it the earliest known
    place of Christian worship by around two hundred years.</p><br
    /><p>According to a <a target="_blank"
    href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/jordan/21067
    52/World's-'oldest-Christian-church'-discovered-in-Jordan.html">report<
    /a> in the Jordan Times newspaper, a very early underground church was
    found beneath the ancient Saint Georgeous Church, which itself dates
    back to 230 AD, in Rihab, northern Jordan near the Syrian
    border.</p></blockquote><br />ht: <a
    href="http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/06/church-possibly.html">Stand
    To Reason</a><br /><br />I'm looking forward to more results from this
    site. That's pretty exciting!
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:03:06 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>A Day in a Greek Orthodox Monastery</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1158#1158</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1158#1158</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1158]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Dan Wallace of the Center for the Study of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM) shares with us, A Day at a Greek Orthodox Monastery.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Dan Wallace of the <a href="http://www.csntm.org/">Center for the Study
    of New Testament Manuscripts (CSNTM)</a> shares with us, <b><a
    href="http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/blog/2008/06/10/a-day-at-a-greek
    -orthodox-monastery/">A Day at a Greek Orthodox Monastery</a></b>.<br
    /><br />That meal time is definitely different than what I'm accustomed
    to.<br /><br />Dan Wallace and the CSNTM are doing great work and a
    great service. It's the digital age equivalent of what the Celtic monks
    did during the medieval period. It's pretty cool stuff!
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 07:46:35 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Insights on the New Atheists</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1157#1157</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1157#1157</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1157]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Amy Hall at the Stand to Reason Blog as post an insightful critique of the work Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris are doing as they criticize not just Christianity, but all religions:
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Amy Hall at the Stand to Reason Blog as post an <a
    href="http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2008/06/the-four-horsem.html">insig
    htful critique</a> of the work Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett,
    Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris are doing as they criticize not just
    Christianity, but all religions:<br /><blockquote>Christopher Hitchens,
    Daniel Dennett, Richard Dawkins, and Sam Harris are actually doing us a
    favor.  The thing I appreciate about these men is that they don't view
    religion as a relativistic, subjective enterprise.	They take the
    claims of Christianity seriously by addressing them as truth claims,
    not preferences.</blockquote><br />I like Amy's thoughts. I wish
    Christians and atheists (and all other religions) would take the same
    view.... I agree with Amy, <b>"If Christianity is not worthy of
    attempts to prove it wrong, then it's not worthy of my life or anyone
    else's."</b>
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 07:50:56 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Thoughts on being Protestant</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1156#1156</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1156#1156</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1156]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Ken Samples started a 4-part series on The Distinctiveness of Protestant Christianity (link to Part 1) today. It is really sad that so many people who are Protestants, or deny being Protestant (Restorationists, Emergers, etc.) but owe the Protestants for their doctrinal roots, are completely ignorant of the history of the Reformation.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Ken Samples started a 4-part series on <a
    href="http://www.reasons.org/tnrtb/2008/06/03/the-distinctiveness-of-pr
    otestant-christianity-part-1-of-4/">The Distinctiveness of Protestant
    Christianity</a> (link to Part 1) today. It is really sad that so many
    people who are Protestants, or deny being Protestant (Restorationists,
    Emergers, etc.) but owe the Protestants for their doctrinal roots, are
    completely ignorant of the history of the Reformation.<br /><br />We
    share such a rich legacy. We really should know something of it.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 10:30:11 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Indiana Jones IV (or "and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull")</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1155#1155</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1155#1155</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1155]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      I liked it. I liked it a lot. There was this great story painted on a canvas of intrigue, espionage, treason, Soviet Russians, South America and aliens.... but none of that was the real story.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    I liked it. I liked it a lot. There was this great story painted on a
    canvas of intrigue, espionage, treason, Soviet Russians, South America
    and aliens.... but none of that was the real story.<br /><br />The real
    story was about adventure, lost loves, true love, happily ever after
    and another generation of a great adventurers. I liked that part of the
    movie. The rest was as good a backdrop for that story as any other.<br
    /><br />I loved the ending.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:35:10 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Hellboy is off the list</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1154#1154</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1154#1154</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1154]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      We went and saw Indiana Jones IV on Saturday, just because we could. After a week, the theater was still full! (wow.)  ... Anyway, we saw the trailer for Hellboy II. It looks like a really, really good, well done movie. But it's definitely not appropriate for our family at this time.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    We went and saw Indiana Jones IV on Saturday, just because we could.
    After a week, the theater was still full! (wow.)  ... Anyway, we saw
    the trailer for Hellboy II. It looks like a really, really good, well
    done movie. But it's definitely not appropriate for our family at this
    time.<br /><br />Oh, well.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:30:19 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>This Summer (2008) in movies</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1153#1153</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1153#1153</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1153]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      I've never seen a summer as packed with movies that I actually want to see! Making things ever so much better, if full of movies I can take the Things to! Woohoo!
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    I've never seen a summer as packed with movies that I actually want to
    see! Making things ever so much better, if full of movies I can take
    the Things to! Woohoo!<br /><br />Already seen:<br />Iron Man<br
    />Speed Racer<br /><br />Out, but unseen:<br />Indiana Jones IV -- the
    Things are hesitant due to the classic Jones gross-factor. No big. I
    can catch it later.<br /><br />Coming:<br />Opening June 6, 2008 -	  
    Kung Fu Panda<br />Opening June 13, 2008 - The Incredible Hulk
    (maybe)<br />Opening June 27, 2008 - WALL-E (definitely!)<br />Opening
    July 2, 2008 - Hancock (Go, Will! I hope this one is "safe")<br
    />Opening July 11, 2008 - Hellboy II: The Golden Army (maybe, it's a
    Marvel character)<br />Opening July 18, 2008 - The Dark Knight
    (probably too dark [look, a pun!] for the Things, AND I need to catch
    up on all of the Batman movies I've missed)
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 15:23:01 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>On the Middle Ages: Building For Future Greatness, John Mark Reynolds</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1152#1152</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1152#1152</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1152]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    <blockquote><br />When religion, especially Christianity, was dominant
    didn’t we live in a Dark Age?<br /><br />Americans are not very good at
    history. We are a young country where Disneyland’s fiftieth anniversary
    was marked as an historical event. Safe to say, many of my students’
    main ideas about the Middle Ages are like those in Monty Python’s
    classic movie, Search for the Holy Grail.<br /><br />What is the
    secular myth of the Medieval? </blockquote><br /><a
    href="http://www.scriptoriumdaily.com/2008/05/29/on-the-middle-ages-bui
    lding-for-future-greatness/"><b>Read the rest of this very good and
    very interesting post by John Mark Reynolds at
    ScriptoriumDaily.com</b></a>
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 10:47:30 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>If in a multiverse, anything must happen...</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1151#1151</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1151#1151</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1151]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Jeff Zweerink at Reasons to Believe has published this really good 6 minute audio (with slides) presentation to address the question, "If multiverse theory were true (in its broadest sense), how would that affect the ability of the scientific enterprise to give us an accurate picture of physical reality?"
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Jeff Zweerink at <a href="http://www.reasons.org/">Reasons to
    Believe</a> has published <a
    href="http://www.reasons.org/tnrtb/2008/05/28/multiverse-musings-does-t
    he-multiverse-destroy-science/">this really good 6 minute audio (with
    slides) presentation</a> to address the question, "If multiverse theory
    were true (in its broadest sense), how would that affect the ability of
    the scientific enterprise to give us an accurate picture of physical
    reality?"<br /><br />Good, good stuff.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:19:38 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Nice way to start the summer</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1150#1150</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1150#1150</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1150]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Interesting day at work today.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Interesting day at work today.<br /><br />Before I even made it to the
    door, my boss says, "Internet's down." ('internet' = network)<br /><br
    />"Okay," and I walk to the nearest computer.... router doesn't ping.
    Go to the server cabinet.... "Uh, yeah. 'Internet' is down!" The
    24-port switch has no lights lit. Reroute power... still no lights.<br
    /><br />great.<br /><br />I did a quick calculation in my head, "I can
    band-aid this with 8 ports. I'll be right back."<br /><br />So, now my
    network is cobbled together with an 8-port switch where there should be
    a 24-port switch. Fortunately, the old switch waited until school was
    out to die on me. I'll have to order a new 24-port switch.... which is
    a shame, because I would like to have planned my purchase instead of
    buying it for triage.<br /><br />Maybe I can get through the summer
    with the band-aid and have time to think about what switch I should
    replace the dead hardware with before I order it....
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:55:15 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>RE: Look!</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1149#1149</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1149#1149</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1149]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Some day I'm going to get the plugin API finished for the RE, then I'm probably going to write a comment plugin so that people can allow for comments attacked to posts. Since the RE isn't designed as a blogging tool per se, that functionality doesn't belong in the core.... in the mean time, I'm going to have to actually look for posts in the "peanut gallery" more often!
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Some day I'm going to get the plugin API finished for the RE, then I'm
    probably going to write a comment plugin so that people can allow for
    comments attacked to posts. Since the RE isn't designed as a blogging
    tool per se, that functionality doesn't belong in the core.... in the
    mean time, I'm going to have to actually look for posts in the "peanut
    gallery" more often!
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 20:38:16 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>peanut gallery</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>The British called, they want their guns back</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1148#1148</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1148#1148</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1148]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      The British called, they want their guns back... too late. Too little? I'm sorry to say, it probably is.
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    <a
    href="http://transsylvaniaphoenix.blogspot.com/2008/05/british-called-t
    hey-want-their-guns.html"><b>The British called, they want their guns
    back</b></a>... too late. Too little? I'm sorry to say, it probably is.
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 20:33:42 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
      <item>
        <title>Speed Racer</title>
        <link>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1147#1147</link>
        <guid>http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?message=1147#1147</guid>
        <comments><![CDATA[http://galacticslacker.com/perl-bin/re?op=new%20entry&id=1147]]></comments>
        <description>
<![CDATA[      Go! Speed Racer, Go!
]]>
        </description>
        <content:encoded>
<![CDATA[    Go! Speed Racer, Go!<br /><br />Yeah, that was a great movie. The
    Things and I dragged Sweetwife along (not-quite kicking and
    screaming).<br /><br />What a great way to tell that story! I was so
    impressed. I had asked one of my students about it, and he said, "The
    thing that struck me most was that it was really pretty." After seeing
    the movie, I see what he means. It was gorgeous!<br /><br />I loved the
    way they told the story and wove in the back-story. I loved the way
    they brought the characters to life. I love the way they focused in on
    family and relationships, honor and responsibility, making good choices
    and being who you are.<br /><br />The photography, cinematography,
    costumes, set design, and CGI were put together and really made the
    story swell from the screen.<br /><br />That was a really fun movie!<br
    /><br />"They don't make ninjas like they used to."<br /> - Pops Racer
]]>
</content:encoded>
        <pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 19:43:47 MST</pubDate>
        <dc:creator>havoc</dc:creator>
        <category>GalacticSlacker HQ</category>
      </item>
    </channel>
  </rss>